Make your own photo slideshow at Animoto.
I have always been amazed by Teletransportation of a material object to a new location by decomposing its molecular structure into atomic elements, transmitting those elements through the cosmos and rebuilding them in the new venue... without loss.Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Third Wave
Alvin Toffler has named the Information Age "Third
Wave" society. He had previously characterized
the transition in developed countries from Agricultural to Industrial Age
society as the “Second Wave”. In the Third Wave, Toffler had predicted broad
social transformations missed in the earlier waves of agricultural and
industrial revolution. The Third Wave began in 1955 and it’s therefore complete.
Now it’s the best time to analyze and validate what Toffler has stated.
In the third wave, Toffler had predicted that our work will
be demassified. This means our work environment becomes less uniform or
centralized as we shift employment from the larger factories to smaller plants
and eventually homes. The phrase “telecommuting” is the first thing that comes
to mind with this prediction. Toffler had also predicted a trend toward
increased specialization, increased involvement of human in reengineering their
own evolution through eugenics, and break up of larger nations into smaller
countries due to race, languages, or other driving forces. Lastly, Toffler had
predicted increased interest in religion and clustering of minority parties in
temporary basis to gain control of government.
William Sherden in his 1998 book called “The Fortune
Sellers” claims that with few exceptions Toffler’s predictions are dead wrong.
I have to disagree with this view. A lot of Toffler’s predictions are actually
right. It’s true that economies of scale in manufacturing still exist in
companies like GE, Philips, Cisco, and HP. What drives this trend is the need
to take advantage of high-cost technologies in larger production plants. But
there has been and increasing demand in telecommuting due to higher cost of
Real Estate and other offices related expenditures. Other factors which
influence telecommuting are related to new tools and technologies for home
offices. Remote employees can use email and teleconferencing solutions such as
WebEx (or Goto Meeting) to do their work from home almost as efficiently as
they if are in the office. Telecommuting has been growing due to these
technological and other forces including traffic and geographically disbursed workforce.
This is a workforce that reaches beyond the restrictions of a traditional
office environment. These are the business realities that multinational
corporations in many countries are facing today to support and sustain
recruitment of the right talent. Toffler’s prediction of telecommuting is therefore
more correct than dead wrong!
The split up of former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia to 15+
new countries is an interesting trend. Since the gulf war, there has been lots
of ethnical violence in Iraq and pressure to split to 3 regions. The Kurds in
the north want to form a nation of their own while the Shiats in the south want
to merge with the neighboring countries. This is an unfortunate trend that
larger nations such as china or India may also get into right after USSR. But William
Sherden again claims that voluntarily confederation of the European States is a
major trend in the opposite direction. The European Union (EU) was meant to an
economic and political union of 27 member states which are located primarily in
Europe. But the EU has had more setbacks than success. The failure of EU’s
currency (Euro) is now recognized as an experiment that has almost failed. Martin
Feldstein in his famous article called “The Failure of Euro” calls this
failure “not an accident or the result of bureaucratic mismanagement but rather
the inevitable consequence of imposing a single currency on a very
heterogeneous group of countries”. The forces of race, religion, language, and
culture outlined in Toffler’s book have indeed driven larger nations to split
into smaller countries. This is another prediction of Toffler that has actually
been more correct that being dead wrong.
David Sarokin in his famous non-scholarly article called “How
the Specialization of Labor Can Lead to Increased Productivity” considers labor
specialization as one of the key features of modern economic systems which has
enabled manufacturing and other business operations to produce goods on a
global scale and to increase productivity. Adam Smith in his classic economics
text "Wealth of Nations" has helped our understanding of labor
specialization as it relates to the technology-driven world in which we live. Sarokin
insists that when workers perform special labor tasks it can lead to increased
productivity and argues that the division of labor leads to a large increase in
efficiency for two key reasons. First is the “allocation efficiency” which makes
the best use of a particular worker's skill. A worker who is good with research
can do a better job in Research and Development than one who is not. The second
force relates to technical efficiency which arises from a division of labor by
reducing the transition time between tasks. This transition is removed when the
resources are focused and specialized on what they do. Because of these
factors, there is an increasing trend for specialization that we can observe in
many industries such as semiconductor, consumer electronics, education, biochemical,
and biomedical engineering. This trend is yet another prediction of Toffler
that has actually been correct.
References
Feldstein, M. (2012).
The failure of the euro. Foreign Affairs 91(1): 105-116.
Sherden, W. A. (1998). The fortune sellers: The big business of
buying and selling predictions. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, A., D. Stewart and M. Garnier (1825). Wealth of Nations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)